Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione), with Ordinance No. 8152 of March 27, 2025, has established an important principle regarding workers’ rights: employees are entitled to reimbursement of the expenses incurred for cleaning their workwear, correctly quantified as one hour of overtime pay per week.
The dispute originated from a lawsuit filed by several permanent employees of a municipal company, assigned to urban sanitation services. The workers requested compensation for both material and non-material damages due to being forced to clean their work uniforms at their own expense.
The Court of Appeal initially rejected their claim, stating that the company was not directly responsible for these costs. The workers then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court accepted the workers’ appeal, referring to the established principle that workwear can be classified as Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). According to Article 2087 of the Italian Civil Code, PPE includes any equipment, complement, or accessory that acts as a protective barrier against health and safety risks, even if not officially certified as such.
Consequently:
In this case, it was undisputed that the employer had failed to maintain the protective clothing, forcing the employees to cover the costs themselves.
The workers requested that the damage be quantified as the equivalent of one hour of overtime pay per week, a criterion the Supreme Court considered valid for evidentiary purposes. The Court emphasized that rejecting the workers’ claims without first admitting oral evidence regarding the expenses incurred was incorrect.
As a result, the Court of Appeal’s decision was overturned, and the case was sent back for a new assessment.
This ruling sets an important precedent regarding the protection of workers’ rights, especially for those required to wear uniforms or protective clothing. Companies must: